It is really
depressing to find that instead of any improvement new and innovative unethical
practices are creeping into our decrepit political system.
At present
selection of candidates by political parties for contesting elections is mostly
based on loyalty, electability and relationship with big guns of the party
instead of merit. Previously party members used to accept the decision of the
party, but of late some aspirants who think that they are the most suitable
candidate, especially if their party is in power are not willing to accept the
decision. To overcome this problem these parties have formulated an innovative
policy. In case there is more than one candidate in a constituency and the
party is unable to decide who has the best chance to win party does not issue
party ticket to any of the candidates and tell them to contest as independent
candidates. The objective is that if anyone from this lot wins the party
has the option of owning the winner. If later the party is able to reach a
conclusion about selecting one of these candidates as its nominee it asks
others to withdraw and issue its ticket to the selected candidate. But,
when some or all of these candidates refuse to oblige, they are offered
incentives in the form of doing some favor in the future. If they
still do not agree they are threatened with disciplinary action. If still these
candidates remain adamant and contest elections as independent candidates their
fate depends on the result of the election. If they lose they are expelled from
the party. If anyone of them is the winner, violation of party discipline is
forgotten and he is approached by the party for his rejoining. If the party is
in power mostly the offer is accepted.
Do these
practices have any legal or moral base? Are these in accordance with democratic
norms, values and traditions?
Is democracy
being strengthened by adopting these practices?
After the
recent first phase of local government election in Punjab, two political
leaders of PML(N) triumphantly declared that the elections were not between PML(N)
and PTI, but between PML(N) and PML(N). Could there be a bigger moral
bankruptcy?
No comments:
Post a Comment